ROUGH DRAFT
Please do not cite without permission


DIASPORAS BEFORE AND AFTER THE NATION:
MOCKING THE POSTCOLONIAL


Christopher Chekuri
Department of History
University of Wisconsin-Madison
cchekuri@students.wisc.edu
&
Himadeep Muppidi
Institute for Global Studies
University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
hmuppidi@tc.umn.edu

Paper prepared for presentation at the conference on
Global Diasporas: Communities of Exile and Migration
Organized by the Border and Transcultural Studies Research Circle
University of Wisconsin-Madison
October 29-31, 1999

On May 18, 1998, the U.S. Senate passed a bill that increased the number of "skilled foreigners" allowed into the territory of the United States every year. This bill, called the American Competitiveness Bill, was passed to improve U.S. national competitiveness in the international system and thereby promote American national interests. While the local American reaction to this bill was not particularly noteworthy-you did not hear about any rejoicing in Flint, MI--it did send ripples of joy more than ten thousand miles away-in Hyderabad city, the capital of Andhra Pradesh, a state in modern India. How do we understand this resonance between localities separated by thousands of miles? What explains the joy of the Hyderabadis and the indifference of the Americans to an event in the U.S.?


Introduction

In April 1997, armed with skills in Sanskrit, Persian, Classical Telugu and after a research proposal on early modern state formation in India, I landed in Hyderabad. I was ready to engross myself in the temple inscriptions, rare classical manuscripts, and village chronicles belonging to Deccani Sultanates of half a millenium ago. I was seeking a cosmopolitan past, a pre-modern/pre-colonial past, a past where Indians, Arabs, Persians, Mongols, Jews, Turks, Armenians, and Abyssinians were fabled to have crossed paths. I was seeking al-Hind, the Arab name for the Indo-Islamic world.
Diligent in finding my al-Hind, and before fully recovering from my jet-lag, I hopped onto my cousin's vespa scooter to meet a well known historian of the Deccan. I was particularly keen on meeting this historian since he knew how to get me an email account that would help me stay in touch with the American world I had left behind. Minutes into our conversation on emails, he said disapprovingly: "You Americans, why are you so ignorant about computers!" I suppose I, along with other researchers from Madison, did not fit his image of a citizen of the technological world, a subjectivity that he assumed on the basis of our U.S location.
Although trained as a historian, he seemed to have an equally good command over the arcana of emailing: terms such "modem strings", "script files," "batch files," rolled off his tongue as easily as Sumati Satakamu, Kanyasulkam, and Tuzuk-i-Jahangir. I soon realized that this was no isolated experience but one that I would have to go through almost daily during my fieldwork time in India. My nostalgic queries about a long forgotten cousin, a childhood friend, a friend of the family were met with the same refrain; "Oh don't you know! She is in Tuscaloosa, Newark, San Jose, El Paso, Detroit…"; the refrain betraying a knowledge of American geography that would be the envy of most middle school geography teachers in the United States. This would soon be followed by the helpful offer of a hotmail or yahoo address of those I was trying to locate. It seemed that we were all connected now, residents and neighbours of a vast Indo-U.S. economic world. But I had to come to Hyderabad to discover that!
As I went through family gatherings, weddings, and other academic and social engagements I kept encountering uncles, cousins, aunts, friends, university professors, librarians, and archivists who were bewildered at my desire to study history: Here was a privileged Non-Resident Indian, a diasporic Indian, an American citizen-with the right license to study and work in the computer industry in the US, making "sixty ", "eighty ", or "hundred K"-choosing, instead, to come to India on a meagre dissertation fellowship to study obscure historical themes that "did not really matter." When they were not commenting on the oddity of my chosen profession, they were turning me into an "expert system" on a much sought after American world: How does one dress in American corporate places? How long is the American demand for software professionals generated by Y2K going to last? What is the H-IB situation right now? I had become a data-base on America: its culture, economy and technology.
In the two years that I was in Hyderabad researching Al-Hind, I found myself discoursing on the minutiae of American English, on the romance and mysteries of crossing various Indo-U.S. borders and on resumes and graduate school statements of purpose. I even found myself discussing the status of the INS quota-system with relatives who were taking a break from farming responsibilites. In between conferences on the subaltern in Indian History, I was invited to speak at coaching centers offering crash courses on American social skills to U.S.-bound software professionals. My only relief came from the recognition that my new found identity as a database on America partially made up for my failure to realize my diasporic destiny. I was not, as it turned out, a completely "useless fellow."
The intensity and depth of Hyderabad's dominant discourse hit home when I overheard my mother cautioning a cousin that, "Vibiki padipoyindi" ("The demand for VB is down!"). VB or Visual Basic, a front-end programming language developed by Microsoft, had been the preferred language for many corporations dealing with database management. The new trend-hastened no doubt by middle-class conversations across the Indo-U.S. border---was to acquire programming skills in a package that included HTML, JavaScript, and Java.
I returned to the US in the summer of 1999 after completing my research and satisfied at having collected and shipped nearly 200 pounds of research materials. But Hyderabad had gotten to me, had changed me. Its "social pathology" was so deep and so all pervasive that I now find myself equipped with the right programming package: I find myself conversant with the C-language, C++ and Java.
I was in the U.S. I had finally come home.
But where was Al-Hind, that fabled cosmopolitan past?


I
Al-Hind: The Indo-Islamic World

Ibn-Batuta, the 13th century scholar from Morocco, travelled in a world that was a "single cultural universe in which he was utterly at home" (Eaton: 44). In making this argument the historian Richard Eaton (44-45) claims that most of Ibn-Batuta's travels:
…took place within what muslims have always called dar al-Islam, the 'abode of Islam'; that is, the inhabited earth where muslims predominated, or failing that, where Muslim authorities were in power and could uphold the shari'a. Everywhere he went [Ibn Batuta] found the civilized company of merchants, scholars, sufis, or princes; and with them he would converse in Arabic, on topics ranging from mysticism, jurisprudence, and especially [events] taking place elsewhere in Dar al-Islam. …..Ibn Batuta intuitively understood that the Muslim world of his day constituted a truly global civilization, even a 'world system'…

Through the ages, India and the central Islamic lands were connected in some critical ways and through a set of complex networks and cultural flows. Called Al-Hind by Arab geographers this was a world that extended from Egypt to Central Asia to South Asia (Wink, 1988). This "single cultural universe" was reproduced through three important institutions; Iqta, Ajam, and Mamluks (Wink, 1988).
Iqta was an institution wherein revenue was collected and expended at the source, without the mediation of a central treasury. Iqta holders were granted these non-hereditary, temporary tenures by various Sultans. This was a system that differed substantially from the european fief. But Iqta was also a form of state-making by which the political borders of Islam were extended. [fn to different forms of Iqta; our concern is with administrative and military iqtas]. Ajam was the heritage of Persia, mainly its traditions of statecraft, ritualized performances of royalty and intricate ceremonials that shaped the contours of courtly culture throughout al-Hind.
The Mamluks were a "one generation aristocracy of alien provenance,"(Wink:37) based primarily on an initial supply of Qipchaki Turks from the Eurasian steppes. These aliens were recruited for their archery and cavalry skills. [ The Turkish groups of the steppes, recently islamized, and a major resource for the Indian states were initially of Qipchaki tribes but not entirely so ]. Their fame was in part due to their possession of technologies not easily produced in the arid plains and plateaus of the Indian subcontinent.
The Mamluk system arose from a failure of the Abbasid caliphate to institute an imperial Muslim aristocracy. This, historians argue, necessitated the creation of "an artificial aristocracy from deracinated elements." Once instituted, the Mamluks made possible a solution to the problems of manpower shortage in state-making and revenue collection. A sizeable number of the Mamluks (Wink, 1988: 15-16) were castrated to ensure their loyalty to the corporate body of the sultan and the state rather than to family, kinship or other rival bodies.
The practices and institutions of iqta, ajam, and the Mamluks were crucial for state formation in Northern India during the 13th century; and they continued in the peninsular Deccan into the 17th century. Peninsular Deccan is essentially the region around modern day Hyderabad. Even those states considered "non-Islamic," such as the Vijayanagara Empire of the Deccan, replicated these three institutions: they imported Mamluks, instituted iqta, and adopted a highly Persianized courtly culture. The early East India Company also could not completely avoid replicating some of these practices.
The production of Al-Hind through such institutions was not, however, a simple question of supply meeting demand, but one of the reproduction of complex and culturally informed practices in different local settings. The Deccani states, such as the Golconda Sultans for example, sent ships to the Iranian port of Hormuz to bring horses and Turks back (Subrahmanyam: 342). The Delhi Sultanate also sought to secure these military and technological resources by overland routes into Central Asia. But however highly skilled, why would Turks come across such vast distances?
The answer to that lay in how India was imagined. For those in Persia and the Persianized Turkic lands, India was a fabled place of wonders and plenty. Youngmen imagined, in Al-Hind, opportunities in courts, iqta tenures and memberships in sufi tariqas.
India, Hindustan, is here as elsewhere …[is]…Dar al-aman, 'the abode of security'…(Digby: 251).

The story of Khwaja Mahmud Gawan Gilani (d.1481), [who lived through the 15th c] one time wazir (prime minister) of the Bahmani Sultanate exemplifies some of the diasporic pulls of this period:
Gawan was an adult migrant to the Deccan who had studied in Cairo and Syria; one of his brothers, Ahmad, remained in Egypt as a trader, while one of the latter's sons settled at Mecca. Mahmud Gawan's own letters, which include extensive correspondence with rulers and intellectuals in Lar, Hurmuz, and other centers in Iran, contain references to his own son Abdullah, who continued in the 1470s to act as his father's agent in the trade between the Deccan and Iran, thus suggesting that those who migrated to the Bahmani Sultanate did not cut off their ties with their homeland. Given the evidence of Gawan's own considerable trade in horses and desire to import military specialists from the Middle East to pursue his campaigns in the Deccan (his letters to the rulers of Lar and Hurmuz in 1473 ask their aid in procuring Futtak-I-atrak wa jawanan-I chalak-Turkish boys and adept youths), he would have been foolish to cut himself off from the very sources of these commodities." (Subrahmanyam, 1992: 343).

Al-Hind also contained elite groups such as the Iranians. These Iranians were extremely adept in participating in the complex economy of the Deccan in activities ranging from holding iqtas to trading rights to important administrative posts. But, like many diasporic groups, they never really lost contact with their lands of origin. Not only did they participate in the trade of skilled Turks and horses but they often maintained large retinues under their own command. These itinerant Iranians can be conceptualized as a type of mobile state-making apparatus or as diasporic corporate states.
There was thus not only a "flow of talent" into the Deccan from Iran, but also a "remittance economy" that existed between the Iranians and their homeland. In that sense there were global flows of meanings, money, bodies and commodities in the fabled world of Al-Hind. The Al-Hind world was an open world across gender and ethnic spaces. Kingship, although primarily defined in masculine terms, accommodated women sultans such as Razia Sultana and Rudrama Devi in 13th century North India and the Deccan.
But of what significance is Al-Hind in understanding the production of global diasporas?


II
The modern global economy

The modern global economy faces a severe shortage of information technology skills. The global demand for IT skills, according to one study, will outstrip supply by 20% in 2004. Within the U.S., about 10% of IT service and support jobs---or 268, 740 positions---remain unfilled. It is estimated that the shortage of IT professionals will cost the U.S. approximately $ 33.4 billion in 1999 alone.
According to one report, 67.5 % of all Asian American computer professionals in the US are from Hyderabad. Hyderabad currently has at least six universities and ten engineering colleges, not to mention hundreds of computer-training schools. Computer-training in Hyderabad, as one commentator noted wryly, is a "social pathology."
The local daily, the Deccan Chronicle, also points out that:
"Irrespective of which [computer software] course is in vogue in the world, the city will immediately have some 50-odd institutes offering training in that. It started with mainframe programme with over 85 institutes offering the same and then 60-odd giving Oracle Financial training and now its the turn of the enterprise resource planning programmes. Whether it is PeopleSoft, SAP or any other programme, the city has institutes coming forth to teach the same."

The Hyderabad of Al-Hind now participates in a different global economy and it is America that dominates the imagination of contemporary Hyderabadis. The flow of talent, of money, and of meanings, is now not between the steppes of Central Asia and the Deccan but between the Deccan and Dallas, Sanathnagar and Sauk City, Ambakhandi and Appleton, Kavali and California. Urban and rural Deccan bodies are increasingly imbricated in the urban and rural spaces of the United States.
Like the Qipchaki Turks centuries earlier, Hyderabadis armed with computer programming skills come to serve the modern Iqtadars of the global economy, the American Multinationals. In the pattern of the empty ships sailing for Hormuz, consulting agencies regularly leave for South Indian cities to get plane-loads of H1Bs. Like the Mamluks of old, some of these Hyderabadis come on restrictive terms and are condemned to be constantly mobile.
The need for constant mobility forces them to minimize or ceaselessly renegotiate their family, kinship and social ties in "foreign" provinces. As individuals of "alien" provenance, they lack the empowerment that comes with green cards or citizenships. Corporate power is reproduced by facilitating the entry of H-1B bodies while restricting the entry of their family members. The new Mamluks are thus symbolically castrated at existing national borders. Twice deracinated in the global economy-from their homes and from their work places-their status resembles that of the Mamluk eunuchs: potent in relation to corporate needs, powerless to fulfill personal desires. As workers in the modern day Dar al-aman, the abode of economic security, they constitute a labor aristocracy that reaches out and expands the frontiers of technology but reaches home primarily through economic resources.
There is also a different group of software Mamluks: the "Indian hordes" of the Jim Clarks, the Larry Ellisons, and the Bill Gates's---the modern Sultans of Software. These "Indian hordes" have a relatively more privileged position in the modern global economy enjoying a slightly greater share of the overall revenue-in the form of IPOs--collected by the new iqtadars. As a recent article in the NewYorkTimes magazine puts it, "the smell of a startup in the Silicon Valley is the smell of curry." Unlike the first group, and more like the Iranians performing ajam, this latter group is intimately familiar with the social rituals of modern corporations. They are the wazirs to the Software Sultans. Many of these diasporic Indians also come from Hyderabad.
But where was Al-Hind then?
Al-Hind, as it happens, was all around us.
But what explains this phenomenon? Is it entirely coincidental that the Deccan/Hyderabad is an important participant in two distinctive global systems stretched across time? How did Hyderabad get to be the node between the past and the emerging future?


III
Why Hyderabad?
Identity and hybridity before and after the nation

Historically, Hyderabad has been the space of hybrid productions. These hybrid productions have acted as strong challenges to the binary contributions of western colonialism and its response, the post-colonial nation.
Hyderabad was the largest of the princely states in the British Empire. As a state headed by a Muslim King with Hindu subjects it initially resisted joining the newly independent India. The Muslim Nizam wanted to join Pakistan. His Hindu subjects wanted a communist state. Postcolonial India disciplined both through its military forces.
Within the newly postcolonial nation, Hyderabad was the northernmost of the southern regions and the southernmost of the northern ones. Reflecting legacy of its precolonial cultural plurality, its lingua franca, Dakhni was a combination of at least five Indian languages: Marathi, Telugu, Kannada, Hindi and Urdu. Dakhni's syntactic template is common to its two subsequent off-shoots: Telangana Telugu and Hyderabadi Urdu. Hyderabadi Urdu is different from the Persianized Urdu of the North and its Telugu is different from the Sanskritized Telugu of the South.
Postcolonial India faced one of its first domestic crises on the issue of the national language. What was to be taught as the national language, given that a truly self-respecting postcolonial self would quickly discard English, a colonial inheritance? Forced to prioritize the "sub-national," national, and ex-colonial linguistic legacies, the postcolonial center threatened to collapse in its fight with northern and southern states. The compromise of a three-language formula satisfied very few with the exception of Andhra Pradesh. The state into which the Telugu speaking districts of Hyderabad were "integrated," institutionalized the three-language formula more seriously than either northern or southern states. Hyderabad complicates any easy slippage from the speaking of Urdu to a Muslim or Pakistani identity. Hyderabad is one of the few places where you are likely to encounter an Urdu speaking Malayali Syrian Orthodox Christian.
Hybridity rules contemporary Hyderabad's urban and rural spaces. Cyber-cafes co-habit with Iranian-chai shops; the economic organization in the former is temporally based, and in the other spatially, on an iqta-like table serrvice. Urdu and Telugu educational systems dot its rural spaces.
Hyderabad's cuisine too mocks the postcolonial nation's gastronomic purities. If after Gandhi, the postcolonial nation presented itself as a vegetarian non-violent nation, with all its obsessions with the cow-protection movements in the Hindi speaking heartland, Hyderabad boasts of delightful menus serving beef biryanis and the largest beef export processing center to the Arabian world, Al-Kabeer.
Hyderabad's hybridity constantly challenges the desire of the postcolonial state for its arrogant claims over the loyalties of its citizens, for its desire for historical permanence, for immortality. In its hybridity, in its ceaseless mixing of the past and present, in its capacity to hold multiple worlds it resists hegemonizing polarities of the postcolonial nation. It represents a "borderlands," a frontier where borders ceaselessly cross each other, a space that neither colonialism nor postcolonial hegemony ever really mastered. This freedom from the postcolonial, this resistance to the postcolonial binaries has facilitated modern Hyderabad's entry into the global economy.
How so?
Globalization is a crisis for the postcolonial self. The postcolonial self-caught between mimicking and mocking the economic practices of the west-has no convincing answers to questions of national identity if it ceases a periodic mocking of the west. Globalization-by intensifying the imitation of the west, by inviting the west to participate in this mimicry-leaves little room for postcolonial resistance to the west. The inability to mock the west raises disturbing questions of what the nationalist fight against colonialism was all about if it was not about establishing some difference from the colonizer. Was the freedom struggle only about becoming the colonizer? Faced with such questions, postcolonial politics constantly impedes any effort at economic globalization. Globalization becomes an identity crisis for postcolonial nations.
Hyderabad, we assert, was never really organized through postcolonial meanings. Its historically produced hybridity acted as a constant check, a constant interrogation of the oppressive claims of the postcolonial nation or a rival sub-nationalism based on essentialized claims of linguistic unity. Never having been hegemonized, unlike lands farther to the east, Hyderabadis have had fewer limitations in interactions with the world outside the postcolonial nation. Often bypassing the postcolonial center, Hyderabadis have flowed into the Gulf as much as into the U.S. But globalization has not created a crisis for the hybrid Hyderabadi identities as it has for those more steeped in the center's postcolonial discourse. Hybridity allows Hyderabad to escape the crisis of the modern nation-state in the age of globalization.

IV
Conclusion

For many social scientists, the nation-state is the taken-for-granted background that underlies analysis. Given that perspective, border crossing is either ignored as an unimportant process or conceptualized primarily in terms of geographical/territorial borders. So borderlands are those areas that literally abut the territorial boundaries of existing nation-states. We have sought to portray a different geography, with different borders-a geography of meanings and identities. On our conception, places that are territorially at the center of the modern nation-state-such as Hyderabad-could potentially be "borderlands" or "frontiers"--parts of different world-systems spatially and temporally. Our intention in doing this is not so much to celebrate Hyderabad and its hybridity as to suggest the possibility of recovering/'liberating' many Hyderabads from the oppressive grip of the modern, postcolonial, nation-state.

Bibliography.

Ayalon, David. Outsiders in the Lands of Islam: Mamluks, Mongols and Eunuchs. London: Variorum Reprints, 1988.
Dale, Stephen F., Indian Merchants and Eurasian Trade, 1600-1750. Cambridge,U.K: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
Digby, Simon. War-Horse and Elephant in the Dehli Sultanate: A Study of Military Supplies. Oxford: Orient Monographs, 1971.
Curtin, Phillip D., Cross Cultural Trade in World History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.
Chamberlain, Michael. Knowledge and Social Practice in Medieval Damascus, 1190-1350. Cambridge, U.K: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
Islam, Riazul. Indo-Persian Relations: A Study of the Political and Diplomatic Relations Between the Mughal Empire and Iran. Teheran: Iranian Culture Foundation, 1970.
Eaton, Richard M., The Rise of Islam and The Bengal Frontier, 1204-1760. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.
--------Islamic History as Global History. Washington: American Historical Association, 1990.
McKeown, Adam., "Conceptualizing Chinese Diasporas," 1842-1949, in The Journal Asian Studies, vol.58, no.2 (May): 306-337.
Lambton, A.K.S., "Reflections on the Iqta," in G. Makdisi ed. Arabic and Islamic Studies in Honor of Hamilton A. R. Gibb. Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1965.
Lambton, Ann K.S., Continuity and Change in Medieval Persia: Aspects of Administrative, Economic and Social History, 11th-14th Century. New York: Bibliotheca Persica, 1988.
Wink, Andre. Al-Hind: The Making of the Indo-Islamic World, vol I-II. Leiden: E.J.Brill, 1990,1997.
Nizami, K.A. On Source and Sources Material. Vol. 1&II. Delhi: Idarah-I Adabiyat-I Delli, 1995.
On History and Historians of Medieval India. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal, 1983.
Narasimhacharya, Madabhushini. History of the Cult of Narasimha in Telangana. Hyderabad: Radha & Sons, 1989.
Soifer, Deborah A. The Myths of Narasimha and Vamana: Two Avatars in Cosmological Perspective. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1991.
Leyden, John. And William Erskine (trans.) Memoirs of Zehir-ed-Din Muhammed Babur: Emperor of Hindustan, Vol. I&II. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1921.
Kotkin, Joel. Tribes: How Reace, Religion, and Identity Determine Success in the New Global Economy. New York: Random House, 1992.
Cohn, Bernard S. Colonialism and Its Forms of Knowledge: The British in India. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996.
Qinn, Sholeh A. "The Historiography of Safavid Prefaces," in Charles Melville (ed.) Safavid Persia: The History and Politics of an Islamic Society. Cambridge, U.K: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Rudner, David W., Caste and Capitalism: The Nattukottai Chettiars. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994.
Le Goff, Jacques. Time, Work & Culture in the Middle Ages. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
Watson, Adam. The War of the Goldsmith's Daughter. London: Chatto&Windus, 1964.
Manuscripts, Collections:
Elliot, H.M. & John Dowson. The History of India as Told By Its Own Historians. Vols.I-VIII. New Delhi: Kitab Mahal, n.d.
De, Harinath. (trans.&ed.) Ibn Batutah's Account of Bengal. Calcutta: Prajna, 1978.